• Recent
  • Categories
  • 0 Unread 0
  • Popular
  • Tags
  • More
    • Guidelines
    • Disclaimer
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Default
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Quartz
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor
Collapse
Definedge Forum Logo
A

Alpha Trader

About
Topics
9
Replies
16
Groups
1
Followers
0
Following
1

All Replies

Recent Best Controversial

    Max SL is not working
  • A Alpha Trader

    image.png

    In any startgy if you are selecting allocation: reinvestment

    After a 5 year capial could be 60L, and position will be taken according to 60L, but SL calculation will be on base capital 20L, which is wrong and doen't give right results

    SL amount: Buy rate x qty x SL %

    if price closes below SL amount, stock should be exited


  • Request to add Max Drawdown on Total P&L
  • A Alpha Trader

    Hi Team,

    I’m writing to recommend adding Max Drawdown (Total P&L/NAV), to the performance dashboard, alongside the realised‑only Max DD currently shown. This captures the largest peak‑to‑trough fall in portfolio equity after mark‑to‑market and aligns with how professional reports evaluate downside risk.

    I belive it's necessary reason being,

    Industry reporting computes drawdowns from NAV/equity, which includes unrealised gains and losses via mark‑to‑market, so excluding them understates max risk which portfolio may face and investor/trader maybe not mentally prepare for this

    I hope request will be considered

    Thanks


  • Max SL is not working
  • A Alpha Trader

    Dear team, @Definedge @@Definedge-Experts

    I’ve been using the momentum trading feature and noticed that the Max SL (Stop Loss) parameter doesn’t seem to be functioning as expected.

    After investigating further, I found that the system currently calculates the Max SL based on the base capital, whereas it ideally should be calculated based on the amount invested in a particular stock AFTER REINVESTEMENT

    so capital should be updated after each trade but it's not, which seems minor bug and hence max sl is not working which can be serious issue if not resolved user can mis interprete data and start trading, so kidnly do the needful ASAP

    Thanks!


  • Backtest result close button
  • A Alpha Trader

    There must be confirmation popup message when closing backtest results, after waiting for 10-15 minutes for backtest, results appears and if close button pressed by mistake it immdetely closing results, now user have to run those backtest again, and it also takes computing power for you which is unnecessary, kindly do the needful, I have expereinced it multiple times so might be happening with many others as well


  • Inconsistent Backtest Results
  • A Alpha Trader

    This happens due to split,bonus and other corporate actions, if you see for longer horizon it won't affect much

    recently I bought 9 shares as per system, but after split, I done backtesting and it showed 10 shares

    so minor differnce could be there, but in long run it average out


  • Suggestion for Improving RZone Backtesting Handling
  • A Alpha Trader

    Dear Definedge Team,

    While using RZone, I noticed that the backtest stops completely if there is even a momentary internet drop (ping loss for a second). This forces the user to restart the entire backtest from the beginning, which is time-consuming and frustrating, especially for longer backtests

    Suggestion:
    It would be very helpful if RZone could:

    Auto-resume backtesting from the point where it stopped once the internet reconnects, instead of restarting from 0.

    Provide a “resume from last checkpoint” option so users don’t lose progress due to a temporary disconnection

    Thanks


  • Wrong backtesting data on Quterly rebalancing
  • A Alpha Trader

    906061d8-7a6f-4673-9713-3f2fe629417c-image.png

    @@Definedge-Experts

    200% positive years is not possibe, i have checked calcaultions here are the differences

    CAGR: ~28.58% (vs site 27.60%)

    Average Annual Return: ~34.69% (vs site ~101.47% )

    Median Annual Return: ~24.12% (vs site ~24.98%)

    Positive Years: ~87.5% (vs site 200%)

  • 1 / 1
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • Blog
  • Youtube Videos
  • Refresh
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Recent
  • Categories
  • Unread 0
  • Popular
  • Tags
  • More
    • Guidelines
    • Disclaimer
  • Users
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • Blog
  • Youtube Videos
  • Refresh