200% positive years is not possibe, i have checked calcaultions here are the differences
CAGR: ~28.58% (vs site 27.60%)
Average Annual Return: ~34.69% (vs site ~101.47% )
Median Annual Return: ~24.12% (vs site ~24.98%)
Positive Years: ~87.5% (vs site 200%)
Dear Definedge Team,
While using RZone, I noticed that the backtest stops completely if there is even a momentary internet drop (ping loss for a second). This forces the user to restart the entire backtest from the beginning, which is time-consuming and frustrating, especially for longer backtests
Suggestion:
It would be very helpful if RZone could:
Auto-resume backtesting from the point where it stopped once the internet reconnects, instead of restarting from 0.
Provide a “resume from last checkpoint” option so users don’t lose progress due to a temporary disconnection
Thanks
I have copied MIP 12 and backtested as it's but results are not matching with what mentioned in book
Is there any way to get rolling return calculation of backtesting , in definedge platform? or do we need to export in excel and have to calcute there by ourselves ?
I have taken MIP 35 strategy as it's from sample strategy given in momentify platform, and kept all setting same as it's
but results are varing massively on what I got on platform vs what shown in book
Also it will help a lot if you add time it took to recover from drawdown
There must be confirmation popup message when closing backtest results, after waiting for 10-15 minutes for backtest, results appears and if close button pressed by mistake it immdetely closing results, now user have to run those backtest again, and it also takes computing power for you which is unnecessary, kindly do the needful, I have expereinced it multiple times so might be happening with many others as well
Just got book delivered, and reading it non stop, feels like getting years of wisdom and knowledge in hours, thanks @Prashant-Shah for making it possible
Hi Team,
I’m writing to recommend adding Max Drawdown (Total P&L/NAV), to the performance dashboard, alongside the realised‑only Max DD currently shown. This captures the largest peak‑to‑trough fall in portfolio equity after mark‑to‑market and aligns with how professional reports evaluate downside risk.
I belive it's necessary reason being,
Industry reporting computes drawdowns from NAV/equity, which includes unrealised gains and losses via mark‑to‑market, so excluding them understates max risk which portfolio may face and investor/trader maybe not mentally prepare for this
I hope request will be considered
Thanks